Banking & FinanceData PlatformLakehouse6 months

Consolidating 14 source systems for a top-10 Vietnamese bank

From 14 disconnected sources and manual reconciliation to a single governed lakehouse serving both regulatory reporting and internal analytics.

−42%

financial close time

260

metrics certified bank-wide

−78%

manual assembly hours

6

months to go-live

Customer context

A top-10 Vietnamese joint stock commercial bank with more than 200 branches and transaction offices. After years of expansion and acquiring systems from multiple vendors, business data sat across 14 systems: core banking, cards, lending, treasury, CRM, digital channels and several internally built applications.

The challenge

Three problems the executive team named as priorities:

  • A 12-working-day financial close. Most of it spent reconciling numbers between systems by hand through intermediate spreadsheets.
  • Inconsistent numbers across divisions. “Closing loan balance” was computed three different ways by three divisions, differing by 2–5% and consuming every review meeting.
  • Analytical queries loading the transactional core. Ad-hoc reports ran directly against core banking, slowing transactions during month-end peaks.

What BigAI delivered

Four phases, each with its own acceptance criteria so the bank saw value early rather than waiting until the end.

Phase 1 — Assessment and design (6 weeks)

Mapped all 14 source systems and interviewed nine business divisions to agree definitions for 260 core metrics. The most important output was not a technical document but a metric dictionary signed off by every division.

Phase 2 — Lakehouse platform (10 weeks)

Built a Bronze/Silver/Gold lakehouse on Apache Iceberg, running entirely on the bank’s own infrastructure. Core banking data loaded via CDC to protect the source system; the rest via nightly batch.

Phase 3 — Reconciliation automation (6 weeks)

Converted 34 manual reconciliation procedures into automated pipelines with data quality rules. Discrepancies now surface the same day instead of at close.

Phase 4 — Handover and training (4 weeks)

Transferred ownership to a seven-person internal data team with operating documentation, incident runbooks and five hands-on training sessions, plus six months of support.

Results

Swipe to see the full table

Results
MetricBeforeAfter
Financial close cycle12 working days7 working days
Manual assembly hours~420 hours/month~92 hours/month
Metric variance across divisions2–5%under 0.3%
Time to onboard a new source5 weeks3 days
The biggest value was not the technology. It was that, for the first time, the divisions sat down and agreed on a shared definition for every metric. Everything after that was execution.
Head of TechnologyTop-10 Vietnamese commercial bank · name withheld by agreement

Technology used

Apache IcebergApache SparkKafka + DebeziumAirflowdbtGreat ExpectationsTrinoKubernetes

Related content

Start with a free 60-minute data assessment

A BigAI solution engineer will review your current data estate with you, identify the highest-value problem to solve and sketch a realistic roadmap. No commitment.

  • Data maturity assessment
  • 2–3 use cases with clear ROI
  • Budget and timeline estimate

By submitting this form you agree to the BigAI Privacy Policy.

Hotline Free consultation